Digoxin-Clarithromycin Interaction: Well-Reported Yet Oft-Forgotten
While digoxin is often added as adjunctive therapy for atrial fibrillation and heart failure, the narrow therapeutic index of the drug may cause some practitioners to shy away from its use. Drug interactions coupled with other risk factors (eg, decreased renal function) place patients at high risk of developing potentially life-threatening toxicity.
Toxicity Manifestations
Digoxin toxicity can be separated into acute and chronic toxicity, with both phases sharing some similar symptoms. Table 1 lists the characteristics of digoxin toxicity.1,2 Digoxin toxicity due to clarithromycin commonly presents acutely with symptoms of nausea, vomiting, confusion, bradycardia, and arrhythmias.2 Malaise may also be a common complaint of elderly patients experiencing toxicity.1-3 While digoxin toxicity is typically associated with levels >2 ng/mL, some patients may present with manifestations of toxicity with normal digoxin levels, especially those with other risk factors.
Risk Factors
The most notable risk factor of digoxin toxicity is impaired renal function, as digoxin undergoes significant renal elimination as unchanged drug.1,2 Elderly patients are at heightened risk of experiencing digoxin toxicity due to age-related decline in renal function and decrease in volume of digoxin distribution.3 Therefore, monitoring renal function is essential not only upon initiation, but periodically throughout therapy as well.
Electrolyte imbalances, including hypokalemia, hypomagnesaemia, and hypercalcemia, also place patients at increased risk of toxicity.1 Supplementation to correct electrolyte levels is prudent to prevent toxicity development. Drug interactions play a large role in predisposing patients to digoxin toxicity as well. While this article is focusing specifically on clarithromycin, many other agents (eg, verapamil and amiodarone) have also been well-documented in the literature to interact with digoxin as well.1,2
Mechanism of Interaction
While the exact mechanism of the digoxin-clarithromycin interaction is unknown, several theories have been proposed. Two such theories relate to the effects of clarithromycin on the GI tract. In a small subset of the population, gut bacteria accounts for a large percentage of digoxin metabolism.4,5 Macrolides eliminate Eubacterium lentum in the gut through their antimicrobial effects which thereby may decrease digoxin metabolism, increasing its bioavailability.4,5 Macrolides also serve as prokinetic agents in the gut via stimulation of motilin receptors which may cause GI disturbance.6 Sutton et al found that erythromycin’s ability to increase gastric emptying resulted in increased oral bioavailability as well as plasma concentrations of digoxin.7
The main mechanism of interaction is thought to be due to strong P-glycoprotein inhibition by clarithromycin, as digoxin is a P-glycoprotein substrate. Through this inhibition, digoxin’s intestinal drug absorption is increased and inactive tubular secretion in the kidneys is decreased.8,9 Both of these altered transport effects lead to increased plasma concentrations. Tsutsumi et al concluded that this mechanism is more predominately seen with oral digoxin therapy rather than intravenous therapy.10
Management
Despite many case reports and case series describing this interaction, no specific recommendations for managing this interaction are available other than monitoring digoxin levels during concurrent therapy with clarithromycin.11-21 Specific details of selected case reports are shown in Table 2.11-14 A profound effect can be seen even with short courses of clarithromycin. The management strategies in these reports ranged from temporary digoxin dose reduction to holding digoxin completely until the course of clarithromycin therapy was completed.11-21 It is important to note that no patients required administration of digoxin specific antigen binding fragments. Digoxin specific antigen binding fragments should be reserved for severe or life-threatening arrhythmias, as its use may unmask symptoms of congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter during the reversal process.1,2
Ideally, this interaction could be avoided via selecting an alternative antibiotic when possible. However, alternative agents are sometimes neither available nor ideal. If clarithromycin must be used, it is essential to monitor digoxin levels and patient clinical status. However, with the body of evidence available indicating toxicity development, it would be prudent to pre-emptively decrease the digoxin dose temporarily upon initiation of clarithromycin rather than doing so after toxicity develops.11-21
Other Macrolides
While erythromycin and azithromycin are weak P-glycoprotein inhibitors compared to clarithromycin, interactions with digoxin still exist.22-26 However, Gomes et al reported that digoxin toxicity is 4 times higher with clarithromycin than either erythromycin or azithromycin.27 Association between antibiotic use and hospitalization for digoxin toxicity was determined and adjusted odds ratios were: 14.83 clarithromycin, 3.69 erythromycin, and 3.71 azithromycin.27 Therefore, interactions with digoxin should be viewed as a class effect for macrolides, with clarithromycin as the most clinically significant. If a macrolide is required, azithromycin is preferred due to less risk of digoxin toxicity.
Key Points For Your Practice:
Digoxin-macrolide interactions are serious and can result in hospitalization and potentially death, with clarithromycin documented as the worst offender. Alternative antibiotics should be chosen for patients receiving concomitant digoxin therapy to avoid this interaction. If alternative agents are unavailable, practitioners should remain vigilant in monitoring digoxin levels and decreasing or holding digoxin doses accordingly during macrolide concurrent therapy. Practitioners should also ensure that patients are well-versed in the signs and symptoms of digoxin toxicity in order to quickly recognize and alert prescribers.
Ryan E. Owens, PharmD, is a PGY2 internal medicine pharmacy resident at Methodist University Hospital and the University of Tennessee Health Science Center, both in Memphis, TN.
Timothy H. Self, PharmD, is a professor of clinical pharmacy at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and program director of the PGY2 internal medicine pharmacy residency at Methodist University Hospital, both in Memphis, TN.
References:
- Yang EH, Shah S, Criley JM. Digitalis toxicity: a fading but crucial complication to recognize. Am J Med. 2012;125(4):337-343.
- Nordt SP, Williams SR, Manoguerra AS, Clark RF. Clarithromycin induced digoxin toxicity.
- J Accid Emerg Med. 1998;15(3):194-195.
- Wofford JL, Ettinger WH. Risk factors and manifestations of digoxin toxicity in the elderly. Am J Emerg Med. 1991;9(2 Suppl 1):11-15.
- Lindenbaum J, Tse-Eng D, Butler VP, et al. Urinary excretion of reduced metabolites. Am J Med. 1981;71(1):67-74.
- Bizjak ED, Mauro VF. Digoxin-macrolide drug interaction. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31(9):1077-1079.
- Pilot MA, Qin XY. Macrolides and gastrointestinal motility. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988;22 Suppl B:201-206.
- Sutton PA, Pilot MA. Digoxin toxicity and erythromycin. BMJ. 1989;298(6680):1101.
- Hughes J, Crowe A. Inhibition of p-glycoprotein-mediated efflux and its metabolites by macrolide antibiotics. J Pharmacol Sci. 2010;113(4):315-324.
- Wakasugi H, Yano I, Ito T, et al. Effect of clarithromycin on renal excretion of digoxin: interaction with p-glycoprotein. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1998;64(1):123-128.
- Tsutsumi K, Kotegawa T, Kuranari M, et al. The effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous digoxin in healthy volunteers. J Clin Pharmacol. 2002;42(10):1159-1164.
- Midoneck SR, Etingin OR. Clarithromycin-related toxic effects of digoxin. N Engl J Med. 1995;333(22):1505.
- Brown BA, Wallace RJ, Griffith DE, et al. Clarithromycin-associated digoxin toxicity in the elderly. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(1):92-93.
- Hirata S, Izumi S, Furukubo T, et al. Interactions between clarithromycin and digoxin in patients with end-stage renal disease. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005;43(1):30-36.
- Guerriero SE, Ehrenpreis E, Gallagher KL. Two cases of clarithromycin-induced digoxin toxicity. Pharmacotherapy. 1997;17(5):1035-1037.
- Zapater P, Reus S, Tello A, et al. A prospective study of the clarithromycin-digoxin interaction in elderly patients. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;50(4):601-606.
- Chan AL, Wang MT, Su CY, Tsai FH. Risk of digoxin intoxication caused by clarithromycin-digoxin interactions in heart failure patients: a population-based study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;65(12):1237-1243.
- Juurlink DN, Mamdani M, Kopp A, et al. Drug-drug interactions among elderly patients hospitalized for drug toxicity. JAMA. 2003;289(13):1652-1658.
- Rengelshausen J, Goggelmann C, Burhenne J, et al. Contribution of increased oral bioavailability and reduced nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin to the digoxin-clarithromycin interaction. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;56(1):32-38.
- Tanaka H, Matsumoto K, Ueno K, et al. Effect of clarithromycin on steady-state digoxin concentrations. Ann Pharmacother. 2003;37(2):178-181.
- Lagerge P, Martineau P. Clarithromycin-induced digoxin intoxication. Ann Pharmacother. 1997;31(9):999-1002.
- Trivedi S, Hyman J, Lichstein E. Clarithromycin and digoxin toxicity. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128(7):604.
- Thalhammer F, Hollenstein UM, Locker GJ, et al. Azithromycin-related toxic effects of digitoxin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998;45(1):91-92.
- Ten Eick AP, Sallee D, Preminger T, et al. Possible drug interaction between digoxin and azithromycin in a young child. Clin Drug Invest. 2000;20(1):61-64.
- Lindenbaum J, Rund DG, Butler VP, et al. Inactivation of digoxin by the gut flora: reversal by antibiotic therapy. N Engl J Med. 1981;305(14):789-794.
- Friedman HS, Bonventre MV. Erythromycin-induced digoxin toxicity. Chest. 1982;82(2):202.
- Morton MR, Cooper JW. Erythromycin-induced digoxin toxicity. DICP. 1989;23(9):668-670.
- Gomes T, Mamdani MM, Juurlink DN. Macrolide-induced digoxin toxicity: a population-based study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009;86(4):383-386.